<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gamers Video Update, January 21, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.platformnation.com/2009/01/21/gamers-video-update-january-21-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.platformnation.com/2009/01/21/gamers-video-update-january-21-2009/</link>
	<description>United We Game!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:12:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Snakeman555</title>
		<link>http://www.platformnation.com/2009/01/21/gamers-video-update-january-21-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8207</link>
		<dc:creator>Snakeman555</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformnation.com/?p=5955#comment-8207</guid>
		<description>I am glad the GVU is back. I hate to be a party pooper but I preferred the old format better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad the GVU is back. I hate to be a party pooper but I preferred the old format better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kosamus</title>
		<link>http://www.platformnation.com/2009/01/21/gamers-video-update-january-21-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8206</link>
		<dc:creator>Kosamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformnation.com/?p=5955#comment-8206</guid>
		<description>Good to see the GVU back, and im glad it got a shiny new coat of paint. Only complaint was that you chose a gray serif font on white that is kinda of hard to read on youtube. Good job though, and dez is right about seeing u - maybe a floating head on a circle or box with you speaking into a headset would make it more identifying. You could even work it into the presentation in a creative way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see the GVU back, and im glad it got a shiny new coat of paint. Only complaint was that you chose a gray serif font on white that is kinda of hard to read on youtube. Good job though, and dez is right about seeing u &#8211; maybe a floating head on a circle or box with you speaking into a headset would make it more identifying. You could even work it into the presentation in a creative way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desz</title>
		<link>http://www.platformnation.com/2009/01/21/gamers-video-update-january-21-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8205</link>
		<dc:creator>Desz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformnation.com/?p=5955#comment-8205</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s ok. If you use your mac, you can use this program that allows you to show your face while also showing your sites or images. I forget the name. People liek to see faces. 

I need to give the GVU a shot one of these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ok. If you use your mac, you can use this program that allows you to show your face while also showing your sites or images. I forget the name. People liek to see faces. </p>
<p>I need to give the GVU a shot one of these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Artlip (Steve519)</title>
		<link>http://www.platformnation.com/2009/01/21/gamers-video-update-january-21-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8204</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Artlip (Steve519)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platformnation.com/?p=5955#comment-8204</guid>
		<description>sorry I meant 2009.

Anyways, what did you guys think of this format?  the powerpoint/keynote format?  Like it?  or do you prefer the old school, in front of video type?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry I meant 2009.</p>
<p>Anyways, what did you guys think of this format?  the powerpoint/keynote format?  Like it?  or do you prefer the old school, in front of video type?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

