December 28th, 2009

Pixeljunk Shooter Reviewed, in so Many Words

This article was written by: mik

The thoughts and opinions contained within this post/podcast are that of a member podcast and do not necessarily reflect those of Platform Nation. The content of each show is determined at their own discretion and may contain explicit content but part of what we strive for here at Platform Nation is to never interfere with the content of a member's show.

The folks at Q may understand better than any other developer how to squeeze maximum impact out of the minute details of a “small” game. Every sound effect, musical refrain, or graphical flourish is a delicious little treat for the senses—and they retain that impact seemingly indefinitely. The gameplay in Shooter delivers in a similar fashion. Equal parts game and science experiment, the fun with physics in Shooter sticks with you long after you’ve completed the game. I only wish it were slightly tougher and lasted a bit longer.

.

About our scale… the number of words in our review reflects the score of the game. In practical terms, you could assume that games reviewed in 49 words or fewer should be avoided, games reviewed in 50-75 words would make a decent rental, and games reviewed in 76 words or more would make a solid purchase.

TheFanboys.com